Philosophy II

THERES A GOOD REASON
THINGS ARE QUIET

The second philosophy suggests that there are explanations as to why we have heard nothing. Some are happier than others, but all are worse than if we were simply alone.

Exciting

Option #1

The entire concept of physical colonization is a hilariously backward concept to a more advanced species. 
An even more advanced civilization might view the entire physical world as a horribly primitive place, having long ago conquered their own biology and uploaded their brains to a virtual reality, eternal-life paradise. Living in the physical world of biology, mortality, wants, and needs might seem to them the way we view primitive ocean species living in the frigid, dark sea.

Exciting

Option #2

We're completely wrong about our reality 
There are a lot of ways we could just be totally off with everything we think. The universe might appear one way and be something else entirely, like a hologram. Or maybe we’re the aliens and we were planted here as an experiment or as a form of fertilizer. There’s even a chance that we’re all part of a computer simulation by some researcher from another world, and other forms of life simply weren’t programmed into the simulation.

Happy

Option #1

There’s plenty of activity and noise out there, but our technology is too primitive and we’re listening for the wrong things. 
Like walking into a modern-day office building, turning on a walkie-talkie, and when you hear no activity (which of course you wouldn’t hear because everyone’s texting, not using walkie-talkies), determining that the building must be empty. Or maybe, as Carl Sagan has pointed out, it could be that our minds work exponentially faster or slower than another form of intelligence out there—e.g. it takes them 12 years to say “Hello,” and when we hear that communication, it just sounds like white noise to us.

Happy

Option #2

Higher civilizations are here, all around us. But we’re too primitive to perceive them. 
Let’s say we have an anthill in the middle of the forest. And right next to the anthill, they’re building a ten-lane super-highway. And the question is Would the ants be able to understand what a ten-lane super-highway is? Would the ants be able to understand the technology and the intentions of the beings building the highway next to them?

Meh

Option #1

Super-intelligent life could very well have already visited Earth, but before we were here. 
In the scheme of things, sentient humans have only been around for about 50,000 years, a little blip of time. If contact happened before then, it might have made some ducks flip out and run into the water and that’s it. Further, recorded history only goes back 5,500 years—a group of ancient hunter-gatherer tribes may have experienced some crazy alien shit, but they had no good way to tell anyone in the future about it.

Meh

Option #2

The galaxy has been colonized, but we just live in some desolate rural area of the galaxy. 
The Americas may have been colonized by Europeans long before anyone in a small Inuit tribe in far northern Canada realized it had happened. There could be an urbanization component to the interstellar dwellings of higher species, in which all the neighboring solar systems in a certain area are colonized and in communication, and it would be impractical and purposeless for anyone to deal with coming all the way out to the random part of the spiral where we live.

Sad

Option #1

We are receiving contact from other intelligent life, but the government is hiding it. 
As time progresses and more and more research and funding is poured into the SETI (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence), the less likely this option becomes. But theories are definitely out there.

Happy

Option #2

Higher civilizations are aware of us and observing us (AKA the “Zoo Hypothesis”). 
As far as we know, super-intelligent civilizations exist in a tightly-regulated galaxy, and our Earth is treated like part of a vast and protected national park, with a strict “Look but don’t touch” rule for planets like ours. We wouldn’t notice them, because if a far smarter species wanted to observe us, it would know how to easily do so without us realizing it. Maybe there’s a rule similar to the Star Trek’s “Prime Directive” which prohibits super-intelligent beings from making any open contact with lesser species like us or revealing themselves in any way, until the lesser species has reached a certain level of intelligence.

Devastating

Option #1

There are scary predator civilizations out there, and most intelligent life knows better than to broadcast any outgoing signals and advertise their location. 
This is an unpleasant concept and would help explain the lack of any signals being received by the SETI satellites. It also means that we might be the super naive newbies who are being unbelievably 
stupid and risky by ever broadcasting outward signals.

Happy

Option #2

There’s only one instance of higher-intelligent life—a “superpredator” civilization (like humans are here on Earth)—that is far more advanced than everyone else and keeps it that way by exterminating any intelligent civilization once they get past a certain level. 
This would suck. The way it might work is that it’s an inefficient use of resources to exterminate all emerging intelligences, maybe because most die out on their own. But past a certain point, the super beings make their move—because to them, an emerging intelligent species becomes like a virus as it starts to grow and spread.

MAYBE WE'RE
ACTUALLY ALONE

Group 1 explanations pose the idea that we may be a statistical anomaly. The only life in our universe. There are several possible realities that support this notion.

Philosophy I